&l;img class=&q;size-full wp-image-116&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/brianthompson1/files/2018/06/Couple-Kissing-Pride.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;600&q; data-width=&q;900&q;&g;
Three years ago, &l;em&g;&l;a href=&q;https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Obergefell vs. Hodges&l;/a&g;&l;/em&g; upended financial planning for LGBTQ couples, legalizing same sex marriage throughout the United States for the first time ever. &a;nbsp;It was a momentous change, obviously, and now people often ask me if there are any remaining differences between financial planning for LGBTQ and heterosexual couples.
The answer is unequivocally yes. Even post-Obergefell, the LGBTQ community faces a wide array of issues that don&a;rsquo;t affect our straight counterparts. &a;nbsp;Some interesting new studies have highlighted issues unique to the LGBTQ financial experience, as well as key planning issues for these households. Today, I&a;rsquo;d like to briefly go over the results and their implications for LGBTQ couples.
&l;u&g;&l;strong&g;The world for the LGBTQ community looks much different now&l;/strong&g;&l;/u&g;
When I first thought of the idea of starting a financial blog for the LGBTQ community, I came across a &l;a href=&q;https://www.prudential.com/media/managed/Prudential_LGBT_Financial_Experience.pdf&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;study by Prudential &l;/a&g;that explored &a;ldquo;the hopes, dreams and fears of LGBT Americans.&a;rdquo; I was so excited to find the report because I&s;d never seen anything like it that specifically focused on the LGBTQ community. &a;nbsp;I found the statistics interesting and really useful when I made the pitch to my bosses about starting my blog. Ironically, just in time for the launch of my new business, &l;a href=&q;https://www.prudential.com/links/about/lgbt-financial-experience&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Prudential offered an update&l;/a&g;.
The update rightly points out that &a;ldquo;the world looks much different today&a;rdquo; for the LGBTQ community than their last analysis back in 2012.&a;nbsp; The &l;em&g;Obergefell&l;/em&g; decision has afforded us access to over &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/132207438684&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;1,100 federal benefits&l;/a&g;, including &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/141487126899&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;filing joint tax returns&l;/a&g;, &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/66872904055&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;putting spouses on health insurance on a pre-tax basis&l;/a&g;, and &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/144552517104&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;spousal protections in the event of death&l;/a&g;.
&l;u&g;&l;strong&g;Marriage is on the rise&l;/strong&g;&l;/u&g;
&l;a href=&q;https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/marriage-and-same-sex-couples-after-obergefell/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;According to the Williams Institute&l;/a&g; out of the UCLA law school, more same sex couples than ever are choosing to marry. In 2013, the year that the&a;nbsp;&l;em&g;Windsor&l;/em&g;&a;nbsp;ruling was issued, only 230,000&a;nbsp;same-sex couples &a;mdash; or about one in five&a;mdash; were married.&a;nbsp;By June 2015, when&a;nbsp;Obergefell&a;nbsp;was decided,&a;nbsp;that number had risen to 390,000&a;nbsp;married same-sex couples were married,&a;nbsp;or 38%&a;nbsp;of the total.&a;nbsp;Just four months later, the total had grown again dramatically to 486,000 married couples, representing nearly half (45%)of all same-sex couples.&a;nbsp; Take a moment to let that sink in &a;mdash; 256,000 same-sex couples married in a little over two years.
&l;a href=&q;http://news.gallup.com/poll/212702/lgbt-adults-married-sex-spouse.aspx&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Gallup offered additional numbers&l;/a&g; showing that 49% of same-sex, cohabitating couples were married in 2016 and 61% for 2017. Gallup also estimates that now 10.2% of all LGBTQ adults are married.
The Prudential study also saw a huge increase in the marriage rate of its participants. Married couples represented just 8% of all participants in 2012 and 30% in 2016. &a;nbsp;In addition, almost half of those respondents said marriage equality had simplified their finances.
Because same sex marriage is so new, it raises some unique planning challenges for LGBTQ couples. I work with a couple in their 50s who have been together for a long time but just recently married. We&a;rsquo;ve focused on things like getting on the &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/to-prenup-or-not-to-prenup&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;same page financially&l;/a&g;, &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/11-common-mistakes-couples-make-when-combining-their-finances&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;commingling assets&l;/a&g; and &l;a href=&q;https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianthompson1/2018/04/04/8-tax-tips-my-clients-taught-me/#1637ccf01a1b&q;&g;dealing with their taxes&l;/a&g; &a;mdash; all issues that most heterosexual couples their age have long settled.
And there are additional complexities around &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/how-to-prepare-financially-for-adoption&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;LGBTQ adoption&l;/a&g;, &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/beyond-adoption-the-cost-of-expanding-your-family&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;fertility and medical expenses&l;/a&g; that many straight couples don&a;rsquo;t face.
&l;u&g;&l;strong&g;&a;nbsp;Some Things Have Changed For the Worse&l;/strong&g;&l;/u&g;
Despite progress in marriage equality, not every aspect of LGBTQ financial planning has gotten better. For instance, here are some negative changes that the Prudential study found.
&l;ul&g;&l;li&g;Lesbian women earn less than heterosexual women, reporting an average annual salary of $45,606 vs. $51,461. (A difference of $5,855)&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;Gay men reported earning an average of $56,936, with heterosexual men earning $83,469. (A difference of $26,533). LGBTQ respondents surveyed in 2016 are less likely to have started saving or investing for retirement, to have insurance products and to have a will or estate plan than those surveyed in 2012 or general population respondents&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;More LGBTQ respondents consider themselves &a;ldquo;spenders,&a;rdquo;&a;mdash; 48% compared to 32% of the general population. The respondents spending patterns confirmed that they spend more and save less, compared to the general population.&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;Overall the LGBT population owned less financial planning products (such as mutual funds, life insurance or will) than the general population.&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;41% of respondents today, compared to 31% in 2012, said they are struggling financially.&l;/li&g; &l;/ul&g;
These statistics clearly debunk the &l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/how-do-you-compare-the-rich-gay-myth-revisited&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;&q;Rich Gay Myth&l;/a&g;&q;. In addition, they demonstrate a need for more financial progress, especially when it comes to the job front.
Currently, there is no comprehensive federal law that protects LGBTQ people from getting fired for their sexual orientation. In fact, &l;a href=&q;https://www.employmentlawlandscape.com/2016/08/seventh-circuit-title-vii-offers-no-protection-against-sexual-orientation-discrimination/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;the Seventh Circuit Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act does not prohibit sexual orientation discrimination&l;/a&g;. That means state law determines legal protections for LGBTQ citizens. Currently only 22 states have an anti-discrimination statute that includes sexual orientation (two of those states do not include sexual identity, or the &q;T&q;) for private employers. You can still be &l;a href=&q;https://www.fastcompany.com/40456937/heres-everywhere-in-the-u-s-you-can-still-get-fired-for-being-gay-or-trans&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;fired in 28 states just for being an LGBTQ individual&l;/a&g;.
This lack of legal protection creates job insecurity and pay inequities that our straight counterparts don&a;rsquo;t have to confront. As such, we have to prepare differently when it comes for saving for emergencies, being out at work and planning for retirement.
&l;a href=&q;https://www.aegon.com/en/Home/Research/lgbt-retirement/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;&a;nbsp;A recent 2018 study conducted by AEGON&a;rsquo;s Center for Longevity and Retirement&l;/a&g; also showed the LGBT workers are more likely than their heterosexual counterparts to have a written plan, yet they are less likely to be saving habitually and at much higher risk of not achieving a &a;ldquo;financially secure retirement.&a;rdquo; The study concluded, &a;ldquo;While LGBT people and heterosexuals share similar retirement aspirations, differences in family circumstance, challenges in the workplace and health issues lead to great vulnerability among LGBT people.&a;rdquo;
&l;u&g;&l;strong&g;&l;/strong&g;&l;/u&g;
&l;u&g;&l;strong&g;A look at other aspects of wealth&l;/strong&g;&l;/u&g;
In addition to job insecurity and income gaps, the LGBTQ community also has some substantial differences in wealth accumulation. According to the Prudential survey, all LGBT respondents had the following amounts of debt (not including mortgage or home equity loans):
&l;ul&g;&l;li&g;45% have less than $10,000&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;34% have $10,000 - $50,000&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;21% have over $50,000&l;/li&g; &l;/ul&g;
Further more the majority of the LGBT population didn&a;rsquo;t have fairly standard financial products:
&l;ul&g;&l;li&g;40% have a savings account including money market or certificate of deposit&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;35% have an employer-sponsored retirement plan (401(k), 403B, 457)&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;18% have an individual IRA that is not employer-sponsored&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;18% have an employer sponsored pension plan&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;15% have mutual funds&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;18% have individual stocks&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;8% have individual bonds&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;42% have life insurance&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;19% have disability insurance&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;10% have long-term care insurance&l;/li&g; &l;li&g;19% have a will or estate plan&l;/li&g; &l;/ul&g;
These percentages are lower than the general population figures, expect for the individual bond percentages, which were equal. My clients and I focus a lot on education about the importance of these tools and how to use them to their advantage.
&l;u&g;&l;strong&g;There&a;rsquo;s Hope&l;/strong&g;&l;/u&g;
&l;p class=&q;tweet_line&q;&g;LGBTQ families face a lot of challenges, but good financial advice can help.&a;nbsp; You just have to find someone you can trust and open up to .
&l;a href=&q;http://btfinancial.com/posts/62715012698&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;I started my blog&l;/a&g; and my firm to help LGBTQ individuals learn more about personal finance and to give our community the tools to make progress toward social and economic equality. While planning can&a;rsquo;t negate all the social and economic barriers that exists for our community, focusing on the things that we can control will help us thrive rather than tread water. &a;nbsp;The Prudential survey found that while fewer LGBTQ respondents (versus general population) work with a financial professional, those that did had loftier financial goals, strong financial confidence and more successful saving.
One thing that I really appreciated about Prudential&a;rsquo;s survey was it took into account the goals of our community. For example, the LGBTQ respondents were much more likely than the general population respondents to say that they need to gain more knowledge in order to tackle their financial goals. They also mentioned that they didn&a;rsquo;t feel fully prepared because they don&a;rsquo;t&a;rsquo; know their options, don&a;rsquo;t know how best to evaluate their options or don&a;rsquo;t know how to get started.
Despite now having full marriage rights, the LGBTQ community has a lot of ground to make up when it comes to succeeding financially. We need to stay informed and help each other succeed. I would love to hear what financial issues you face. Email, Tweet or message me at the links below.
Shares of C&J Energy Services Inc (NYSE:CJ) rose 5.7% on Friday . The company traded as high as $24.45 and last traded at $24.25. Approximately 3,274,500 shares traded hands during trading, an increase of 196% from the average daily volume of 1,105,209 shares. The stock had previously closed at $22.95.
HeidelbergCement (ETR:HEI) received a €104.00 ($120.93) price objective from equities researchers at Sanford C. Bernstein in a research report issued to clients and investors on Wednesday. The brokerage currently has a “buy” rating on the basic materials company’s stock. Sanford C. Bernstein’s price target indicates a potential upside of 32.65% from the stock’s previous close.